By Michael LaBossiere

30 Fallacies is a better half publication for forty two Fallacies. forty two Fallacies isn't really, notwithstanding, required to take advantage of this e-book. It offers concise descriptions and examples of thirty universal casual fallacies.

Accent, Fallacy of
Accident, Fallacy of
Amphiboly, Fallacy of
Appeal to Envy
Appeal to crew Identity
Appeal to Guilt
Appeal to Silence
Appeal to Vanity/Elitism
Argumentum advert Hitlerum
Complex Question
Confusing motives and Excuses
Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
Equivocation, Fallacy of
Fallacious Example
Fallacy Fallacy
Historian’s Fallacy
Illicit Conversion
Incomplete Evidence
Moving the target Posts
Oversimplified Cause
Overconfident Inference from Unknown Statistics
Pathetic Fallacy
Positive advert Hominem
Proving X, Concluding Y
Psychologist's fallacy
Reification, Fallacy of
Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy
Victim Fallacy
Weak Analogy

Show description

Read or Download 30 More Fallacies PDF

Similar logic & language books

Formal Languages in Logic: A Philosophical and Cognitive by Dr Catarina Dutilh Novaes PDF

Formal languages are greatly considered as being principally mathematical gadgets and as generating a better point of precision and technical complexity in logical investigations due to this. but defining formal languages solely during this approach bargains just a partial and restricted clarification of the effect which their use (and the makes use of of formalisms extra usually in other places) truly has.

Read e-book online Mental Files in Flux PDF

Francois Recanati has pioneered the 'mental dossier' framework for brooding about thoughts and the way we seek advice from the area in inspiration and language. psychological records are in line with 'epistemically profitable' kin to things within the atmosphere. status in such kinfolk to things places the topic able to achieve information about them.

Extra info for 30 More Fallacies

Example text

You know that the Nazis were for national health care. They also killed all those people in the death camps. ” Ricardo: “I watch the History Channel, so yeah, I know. ” Complex Question Description: This fallacy is committed by attempting to support a claim by presenting a question that rests on one or more unwarranted assumptions. The fallacy has the following form: 1) Question Q is asked which rests on assumption (or assumptions) A. 2) Therefore A is true. This version of the fallacy is similar to begging the question in that what is in need of proof is assumed rather than properly established.

As a final point, there are far more fallacies than are listed in this book (or any book). So, just because something does not match a named fallacy, it might still be a fallacy (or it might not). Examples Example of a Valid Deductive Argument Premise 1: If Bill is a cat, then Bill is a mammal. Premise 2: Bill is a cat. Conclusion: Bill is a mammal. Example of a Strong Inductive Argument Premise 1: Most American cats are domestic house cats. Premise 2: Bill is an American cat. Conclusion: Bill is domestic house cat.

Naturally, the mate intended that the reader would take this emphasis as an indication that the event was unusual enough to be noted in the log and thus infer that the captain was drunk on all the other days. Obviously, to believe that conclusion would be to fall victim to the fallacy of accent. ” Ted: “But you love Jennifer and have all her movies. ” Sally: “I’ll do exactly what she said. ” Sally: “Not at all. ” Example #2 Dr. ” Stephen: “Hey, Bob! Dr. ’” Bob: “In that case, I’m going to buy it.

Download PDF sample

30 More Fallacies by Michael LaBossiere

by Jason

Rated 4.51 of 5 – based on 11 votes